Мегаобучалка Главная | О нас | Обратная связь


WHAT’S WRONG WITH MARRYING FOR LOVE



2015-11-10 1216 Обсуждений (0)
WHAT’S WRONG WITH MARRYING FOR LOVE 0.00 из 5.00 0 оценок




Falling in love is the expected and proper prelude to marriage. As presently interpreted, this means that you marry for love and that you work at it after marriage. A successful marriage is the final realization of a romantic attraction.

A good marriage is one that contributes fully to personality development; a poor marriage is one that hinders it. Getting married is in the first place a romantic adventure, with an emphasis upon individual rights and freedom from parental control rather than a carefully reasoned choice involving a prudent weighing of other factors important for a lifelong union. Passionate attachment and anticipated happiness outweigh such considerations as companionship, cultural similarity and common social experience. We proudly announce that we no longer marry for convenience, to promote a career or to please our families, but to establish a personally desirable relationship that is voluntary, rests on personal choice, and aims at individual happiness and personality development.

Romance is beautiful. Wonderful. But as the primary basis for selection of matrimonial mates? On which to build a lifelong union? Many things must be considered. Young people need the counsel of their elders.

Marriage is a momentous step. It must be carefully considered. This is the verdict of other centuries. Since the culture has been noted through centuries for its devotion to family life an virtues, some of its historic methods of mate selection might be considered by way of example. First came the parents and grandparents, who determined when and under what circumstances their young should marry. Also, they had a great deal to say about the choice of the mate. Much as parental control of marriage has been disparaged in our society there are some things that can be said on its behalf. Parents do know something about the nature and needs of their children. They can judge their mate through the eyes of their greater age and experience. And they do seek the happiness of their child.

Does modern research throw any light on the validity of romance as a basis of mate selection? What are the findings of recent studies of marital problems? Romance according to some researchers is a process of fantasy formation, usually adolescent when one idealizes another person, ignoring the faults and magnifying the virtues of the loved one. (After marriage there’s an emotional return to reality). Other students of the problem see it as a striving for emotional security, so lacking in casual relations of our everyday life. Whatever the facts may be in any of these interpretations it should be noted that all see romantic love as a form of compensating emotion, personally satisfying, idealizing someone else but unrelated to reality.

Studies of marital failure and success show quite clearly that marriages based chiefly or wholly on romantic attraction do not turn out nearly as well as those built on more comradely affection. Supporting this conclusion are other studies showing that the longer the period of acquaintance before marriage, the greater are the chances of marital success.

Perhaps most essential is the importance of similarity of social background for marital success. This means that like should marry like. “Marriage,” writes a well-known family sociologist, ‘involves living with a person, not merely loving him.” It is this prosaic fact that places romantic love in its proper proportions as a basis for marriage. Romance must be termed the prelude to the more sober and realistic consideration of a mate, but romance alone is not enough.

(from http://www.love-making-tips.com/article-love-marriage.html)

 

Text 14

ROMANTIC LOVE

In the English-speaking culture marriage is supposed to be based on romantic love of the spouses. Though romance does not totally deny pragmatic considerations, like family background or earning potential of the male partner, the majority of Britons and Americans will look askance at those who marry for money or other pragmatic reasons.

Romantic love is a strong feeling of fondness between a man an a woman, based on sexual attraction. It involves both physical symptoms, such pounding heart, and psychological symptoms, such as obsessive focus on one person and disregard for any resulting social or economic risks. However, happily enough, romance defies a clinical definition. Love is irrational and overwhelming, it takes you by surprise and appears impossible to resist. It can be returned or one-sided, instant (at first sight) and short-lived or life-long. Anyway, it looks like fate.

It may be for this reason that Western society has historically emphasized romantic love far more than other cultures. Romantic love became a recognized passion in the Middle Ages, when in some cases insurmountable barriers of morality or convention separated the lovers. The effect of physical attraction and impossibility of intimacy resulted in an excessive regard of the beloved as extremely precious. Winning the love, or at least the attention, of the beloved, motivated great efforts of many kinds, such as poetry, song or feats of arms.

In more modern times romantic love has been portrayed and endorsed in art and entertainment in all its forms. Some of the greatest poetry (e.g. Shakespeare's sonnets), opera (e.g. La Boheme), and literature (e.g. Pride and Prejudice) have romantic love as the main theme. Similarly much of more popular culture from theatre to film to popular music has romantic love at its heart. In every day life romance is usually represented by boxes of chocolates, red roses, dinners by candle light, love letters, and walks by the light of the moon.

Apparently, this culture encourages us to look for romance – to find your other half, the ‘one and only’. If acquired love may be the basis for a lifelong union. More than that, it is often looked upon as the highest form of self-fulfillment.

Unfortunately, while for many romantic love is a dream and incentive to marriage, some claim that such love as is depicted in books and movies rarely, if ever, occurs. They point to the modern practice of dating, where often the goal is to have sexual intercourse as soon as possible instead of building a lasting relationship. Besides, the rigorous demands of careers in the modern world often rob people of the time to find such ideal companions.

At any rate, romantic love is a noble idea, and it can certainly provide a basis for a marriage whose success is expected to be guaranteed by the spouses’ enduring passion, and permit them to ‘live happily ever after.’ But since marriage can equally well be founded on much more practical considerations, there is a never-ending debate between those who believe in romantic marriage and those who don’t.

Romantics will often criticize pragmatic marriage, considering it oppressive, inhuman, sexist and, therefore, immoral. Defenders of pragmatic marriage disagree, often pointing to cultures where the success rate of pragmatic marriages is seen to be very high, and holding that nearly all couples learn with time to love each other very deeply. They also state that pragmatic marriage is traditional, that it upholds social morals, that it is good for the families involved, whereas romantic marriage is short-term, overly based on sexual desire, and immoral.

Their opponents insist that it is preferable to achieve an emotional bond before entering into a lifelong commitment. Besides, a loving and affectionate relationship helps to sustain the family “ever after as the wedding bells”.

Firstly, romantic love helps the young partners to loosen their bonds with their parents’ family, a step that is essential if a new nuclear family is to be created. Being totally absorbed in each other, the young couple will more easily transfer their loyalties from existing family and kin to their own family. Secondly, romantic love provides the couple with emotional support in the difficulties that they will inevitably face in establishing a new life of their own. Mutual love and care will enable them to confront problems cooperatively. Otherwise, life might not look like a bed of roses.

(compiled from http://en.wikipedia.org.)

Text 15



2015-11-10 1216 Обсуждений (0)
WHAT’S WRONG WITH MARRYING FOR LOVE 0.00 из 5.00 0 оценок









Обсуждение в статье: WHAT’S WRONG WITH MARRYING FOR LOVE

Обсуждений еще не было, будьте первым... ↓↓↓

Отправить сообщение

Популярное:
Как распознать напряжение: Говоря о мышечном напряжении, мы в первую очередь имеем в виду мускулы, прикрепленные к костям ...
Модели организации как закрытой, открытой, частично открытой системы: Закрытая система имеет жесткие фиксированные границы, ее действия относительно независимы...



©2015-2024 megaobuchalka.ru Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. (1216)

Почему 1285321 студент выбрали МегаОбучалку...

Система поиска информации

Мобильная версия сайта

Удобная навигация

Нет шокирующей рекламы



(0.007 сек.)