Methods of teaching and learning

Practical:oral questioning, testing, analysis of medical records, the solution case studies.

Student’s independent work the teacher controlled (SIWTC):

participate in the reception of patients, supervision case patients, practical skills, interpretation of laboratory results.

Students’ independent work (SIW)working with phantom, students work with a training and additional literature, electronic media and the Internet, abstracts and presentations.

The form of the SIW:Abstracts work, project work (presentation).

Criteria and rules of assessment.

Methods for assessing the knowledge and skills of students:

Assessing the students on five criteria of competence:

1. Theoretical knowledge of the student are assessed on the previous criteria - added test answers, oral questioning, solutions situational problems. (ГОСО РК 5.03.06-2006 «Система образования Республики Казахстан. Контроль знаний в высших учебных заведениях» от 26.08.2006г.). The maximum score – 100

2. To assess the practical skills evaluated each step the assignment. Performed by the student practical skills are assessed on the following criteria:

The maximum score – 100

3. Assessment of communication skills

The maximum score – 100

4. Patient advocacy skills assessed by an oral examination. The maximum score – 100

5. The process of self-improvement of the student is evaluated based on the results of independent work of the student, knowledge of the latest research data on a given topic, participating in the research work of the student, conferences. The maximum score – 100

The evaluation criteria of independent work of the student

Summary:

90-100 score of "excellent" -the student has shown a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the material topics accurately and creatively fulfilled the task with respect to the structure of the presentation abstract different sources of text with illustration, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years;

75-89 points "good" -the student fulfilled the assignment subject to presentation of an abstract structure, using different sources of text with illustration, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years, with the unprincipled made ​​mistakes in the presentation of the material;

50-74 points "satisfactory" -the student finished the task very briefly, not in full, and the fundamental mistakes made ​​in the presentation of the material;

49 points or less "unsatisfactory" -the structure of the presentation abstract inadequate.

Presentation:

90-100 score of "excellent" -the student has shown a comprehensive and in-depth knowledge of the material topics accurately and creatively fulfilled the task to meet a delivery structure presentation. The main points of clear and specific themes reflected by 10-15 slides, highlighting the most important information, with reference to the literature over the past 5 years. Illustrations of good quality (high resolution), with a clear image.

75-89 points "good" -the student fulfilled the assignment subject to presentation of the layout structure, and the unprincipled made ​​mistakes in the presentation;

50-74 points "satisfactory" -the student finished the task very briefly or with large amounts of text on a slide, illustrations of satisfactory quality;

49 points or less "unsatisfactory" -introduced the presentation does not meet the requirements.