Swings and roundabouts
Although currency traders are aware of the perils ahead, securities dealers have yet to wake up to them, perhaps because it is trickier to gauge how far world stockmarkets arc becoming more correlated. At some times they have seemed closely synchronised - as in October 1987 when most went into a tailspin. But at others they refuse to fly in formation: last year, the French stockmarket found it hard to get airborne, even as New York and London soared. Many equity strategists believe that national stockmarkets will move closer together. As an example, they point to the experience of the European Union (EU). In a forthcoming study, a group of economists at BARRA International, a consultancy, looked at the correlation among 19 rich-country stockmarkets. After eliminating the effects of swings in the global economy and in individual industries, they found that nine eu stockmarkets have become more correlated since the early 1980s. When they applied similar analysis to world stockmarkets, they found less evidence of increasing correlation. Yet many believe that world markets will undergo the same experience. One reason is that national economies are becoming more integrated. The main causes of this are increases in international capital flows and falling trade barriers. These factors will make national economies - and hence stock-markets - more dependent on supply and demand in other economies. A stronger argument still may be that direct barriers to integration are continuing to fall, as capital controls are rolled back and better technology slashes transaction costs. As this happens, argues Robert Merton, a financial economist at Harvard Business School, national markets may be more exposed to world economic trends. This should make equity markets more closely correlated, threatening the profits of those who depend on diversity. If you ask most equity analysts - even those who believe that more correlated markets lie just over the horizon - what all this might mean for trading profits, you are more than likely to be greeted with an earful of fluff. One analyst who has given it serious thought, however, is Mark Cliffe, an economist at HSBC Markets, a British securities firm. He argues that increasing integration will diminish the gains from diversification among rich-country markets dramatically. As a result, he claims, more fund managers will imitate the strategy of some American funds by “leapfrogging” part of the international diversification process: they will ignore many developed markets altogether, and invest in a combination of domestic and emerging-market equities since these are likely to remain less correlated for longer. This could cut the profits of mid-sized securities firms in America and Europe, which depend on the eagerness of rich-country investors to pile into each other’s markets. Nor will securities firms in emerging markets automatically benefit. For a start, if rich-country investors come rushing in, it will probably be because barriers, both economic and regulatory, fall. But it is these barriers that have given local firms an advantage in the first place. Integrated global markets would also put local players at a disadvantage for another reason: the kind of information that is valuable would change dramatically, becoming more international and less local. The big squeeze Ultimately, even big firms in rich countries may be at risk. This is because the thing that they are promoting, and that is tying stock-markets closer together - bigger flows of portfolio capital - is going to pose a more direct threat to their livelihood. So will computer technology and increased awareness of costs among borrowers. The main force behind increased portfolio flows is the expanding global reach of fund managers, who are slashing execution costs in several ways, none of them good for traders. Technology and deregulation are uncovering restrictive practices that have protected traders for years. And users of capital are questioning why they should pay bankers and brokers at all, rather than dealing direct with the fund managers. All this means that financial intermediaries are going to be under increasing pressure, from all sides. Some may relish the notion that increased integration means a smoother ride; but they may soon start to yearn for the old rollercoaster.
VOCABULARY
4. Переведите отрывок «Swings and roundabouts».
Популярное: Организация как механизм и форма жизни коллектива: Организация не сможет достичь поставленных целей без соответствующей внутренней... Как выбрать специалиста по управлению гостиницей: Понятно, что управление гостиницей невозможно без специальных знаний. Соответственно, важна квалификация... ©2015-2024 megaobuchalka.ru Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав. (200)
|
Почему 1285321 студент выбрали МегаОбучалку... Система поиска информации Мобильная версия сайта Удобная навигация Нет шокирующей рекламы |